If you’ve been injured in a motorcycle accident in Alaska and weren’t wearing a helmet at the time, you may be wondering if you still have the right to seek compensation. It’s a common concern — and an important one. Alaska’s helmet laws are relatively lenient, but insurance companies may still try to use your lack of a helmet to reduce or deny your claim.
The good news is that even if you weren’t wearing a helmet, you can still file a motorcycle accident claim. However, whether and how much compensation you receive could be affected depending on your age, the type of injuries you sustained, and how fault is assigned. At the Law Office of Curtis W. Martin, we help injured victims of motorcycle accidents in Alaska recover the compensation they need to move forward.
Alaska does not require all motorcyclists to wear helmets. Instead, the state’s helmet law is based on age and rider classification. According to Alaska Statutes § 28.05.011:
That means if you’re an adult riding with a valid motorcycle license, choosing not to wear a helmet is not a violation of the law. However, legal does not always mean consequence-free, especially in a personal injury claim.
Whether you were complying with the helmet law can influence how your case is evaluated, particularly when it comes to determining fault and calculating damages for head injuries.
Possibly — but it depends on the facts of your case. Alaska follows a pure comparative negligence system. This means that even if you’re partially at fault for your injuries, you can still recover compensation. However, your total damages will be reduced by your percentage of fault.
For example, let’s say you’re riding legally without a helmet and another driver runs a red light and crashes into you. You suffer a traumatic brain injury. The driver is clearly at fault for causing the accident, but the insurance company argues that your injuries were worsened because you weren’t wearing a helmet. A court may agree and assign, say, 30% of the fault to you. If your total damages are $100,000, your compensation would be reduced to $70,000.
Here’s what to keep in mind:
In short, not wearing a helmet does not disqualify you from filing a claim, but it can be used as a factor in reducing the value of your claim if your injuries are connected to that decision.
Insurance companies are in the business of minimizing payouts, and helmet use is one of the first things they will investigate after a motorcycle accident. Even in states like Alaska where helmet use isn’t mandatory for adults, insurers may argue that your decision not to wear one contributed to your injuries — especially if you suffered a concussion, skull fracture, or traumatic brain injury.
They might hire medical experts to testify that your injuries could have been avoided, or they may try to assign a high percentage of comparative negligence to you. In some cases, they’ll use this argument as leverage to push for a low settlement — even if you weren’t primarily at fault for the crash.
That’s why working with a skilled attorney is crucial. Our motorcycle accident team knows how to counter these tactics and build a case that accurately reflects the real cause of your injuries: the negligence of another driver.
If you were involved in a motorcycle crash and weren’t wearing a helmet, here’s what you should do to protect your claim:
Even if you made the personal choice to ride without a helmet — and were legally allowed to do so — that doesn’t mean you should pay the price for another driver’s mistake. With the right legal guidance, you can fight back against insurance company tactics and pursue the compensation you deserve.
If you’ve been hurt in a motorcycle crash in Palmer or anywhere in Alaska, and you're unsure how your lack of a helmet might affect your case, contact us today for a free case evaluation. We’re here to answer your questions, protect your rights, and help you move forward with confidence.